The scaling is a five point one; Strongly Disagree, Disagree, Neutral, Agree and Strongly Agree. A few points caught my eye as I went through the results.
- There is support for a mining tax in Australia with a strong 37.1% which I'm sure the leading Labour party will want to stick up the public's faces.
- The sentencing of price-fixing executives received 51.4% in a just agree which reflects well the current economic times.
- A price-based mechanism (taxes, subsidies or emission trading scheme) is deemed appropriate in the fight against greenhouse gas emissions. 44.4% strongly agree to one which is again food for the Labour politicians.
- A requirement for women to be designated a minimum amount of seats as directors does not do well with the economists with a dismal 35% disagreeing to such an arrangement. Would this have been informed by the fact that only 18.8% of the respondents were women?
- Not so surprisingly still, there is strong support for the appropriateness of monetary easing tendencies of governments in times of severe recession. 50% agree while a strong 25.9% strongly agree. I wonder how this would have changed were this to be the USA. Does monetary easing check out as strongly as economists believe it does? Are there other options?
- Interesting to note a 42.7% agreement on congestion pricing for Australian cities. I wonder which political side is bold enough to even mention such a thing. I'd probably bet on Labour quite confidently though.
- There is a 45.8% support for skilled migrant intake showing a real worry in Australia regarding labour shortages. How much longer will the Liberal coalition see this light?
- And as I would have expected the disastrous first-home buyers grant received a 40.4% strong disagreement and just to stress that, another neat 30.5% just disagreeing. Clearly Labour executed this one awe-fully.
- The economists maintain a favour for a rebate on private healthcare funds in Australia though. We see 32.6% disagreeing on abolishing the rebate.
No comments:
Post a Comment